Skip to main content

Seizing FSMO Roles



Windows 2000/2003 Active Directory domains utilize a Single Operation Master method called FSMO (Flexible Single Master Operation), as described in Understanding FSMO Roles in Active Directory.

The five FSMO roles are:
Schema master - Forest-wide and one per forest.
Domain naming master - Forest-wide and one per forest.
RID master - Domain-specific and one for each domain.
PDC - PDC Emulator is domain-specific and one for each domain.
Infrastructure master - Domain-specific and one for each domain.

In most cases an administrator can keep the FSMO role holders (all 5 of them) in the same spot (or actually, on the same DC) as has been configured by the Active Directory installation process. However, there are scenarios where an administrator would want to move one or more of the FSMO roles from the default holder DC to a different DC.

Moving the FSMO roles while both the original FSMO role holder and the future FSMO role holder are online and operational is called Transferring, and is described in the Transferring FSMO Roles article.

However, when the original FSMO role holder went offline or became non operational for a long period of time, the administrator might consider moving the FSMO role from the original, non-operational holder, to a different DC. The process of moving the FSMO role from a non-operational role holder to a different DC is called Seizing, and is described in this article.

If a DC holding a FSMO role fails, the best thing to do is to try and get the server online again. Since none of the FSMO roles are immediately critical (well, almost none, the loss of the PDC Emulator FSMO role might become a problem unless you fix it in a reasonable amount of time), so it is not a problem to them to be unavailable for hours or even days.

If a DC becomes unreliable, try to get it back on line, and transfer the FSMO roles to a reliable computer. Administrators should use extreme caution in seizing FSMO roles. This operation, in most cases, should be performed only if the original FSMO role owner will not be brought back into the environment. Only seize a FSMO role if absolutely necessary when the original role holder is not connected to the network.



FSMO Role Loss implications
Schema The schema cannot be extended. However, in the short term no one will notice a missing Schema Master unless you plan a schema upgrade during that time.
Domain Naming Unless you are going to run DCPROMO, then you will not miss this FSMO role.
RID Chances are good that the existing DCs will have enough unused RIDs to last some time, unless you're building hundreds of users or computer object per week.
PDC Emulator Will be missed soon. NT 4.0 BDCs will not be able to replicate, there will be no time synchronization in the domain, you will probably not be able to change or troubleshoot group policies and password changes will become a problem.
Infrastructure Group memberships may be incomplete. If you only have one domain, then there will be no impact.


Important: If the RID, Schema, or Domain Naming FSMOs are seized, then the original domain controller must not be activated in the forest again. It is necessary to reinstall Windows if these servers are to be used again.

The following table summarizes the FSMO seizing restrictions:

FSMO Role Restrictions
Schema Original must be reinstalled
Domain Naming
RID
PDC Emulator Can transfer back to original
Infrastructure


Another consideration before performing the seize operation is the administrator's group membership, as this table lists:

FSMO Role Administrator must be a member of
Schema Schema Admins
Domain Naming Enterprise Admins
RID Domain Admins
PDC Emulator
Infrastructure


To seize the FSMO roles by using Ntdsutil, follow these steps:


Caution: Using the Ntdsutil utility incorrectly may result in partial or complete loss of Active Directory functionality.


On any domain controller, click Start, click Run, type Ntdsutil in the Open box, and then click OK.Microsoft Windows [Version 5.2.3790] (C) Copyright 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp. C:\WINDOWS>ntdsutil ntdsutil:

Type roles, and then press ENTER.ntdsutil: roles fsmo maintenance:


Note: To see a list of available commands at any of the prompts in the Ntdsutil tool, type ?, and then press ENTER.
Type connections, and then press ENTER.fsmo maintenance: connections server connections:

Type connect to server <servername>, where <servername> is the name of the server you want to use, and then press ENTER.server connections: connect to server server100 Binding to server100 ... Connected to server100 using credentials of locally logged on user. server connections:

At the server connections: prompt, type q, and then press ENTER again.server connections: q fsmo maintenance:

Type seize <role>, where <role> is the role you want to seize. For example, to seize the RID Master role, you would type seize rid master:

Options are:Seize domain naming master Seize infrastructure master Seize PDC Seize RID master Seize schema master

You will receive a warning window asking if you want to perform the seize. Click on Yes.fsmo maintenance: Seize infrastructure master Attempting safe transfer of infrastructure FSMO before seizure. ldap_modify_sW error 0x34(52 (Unavailable). Ldap extended error message is 000020AF: SvcErr: DSID-03210300, problem 5002 (UNAVAILABLE) , data 1722 Win32 error returned is 0x20af(The requested FSMO operation failed. The current FSMO holde r could not be contacted.) ) Depending on the error code this may indicate a connection, ldap, or role transfer error. Transfer of infrastructure FSMO failed, proceeding with seizure ... Server "server100" knows about 5 roles Schema - CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER200,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dpetri,DC=net Domain - CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER100,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dpetri,DC=net PDC - CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER100,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dpetri,DC=net RID - CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER200,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dpetri,DC=net Infrastructure - CN=NTDS Settings,CN=SERVER100,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=dpetri,DC=net fsmo maintenance:


Note: All five roles need to be in the forest. If the first domain controller is out of the forest then seize all roles. Determine which roles are to be on which remaining domain controllers so that all five roles are not on only one server.
Repeat steps 6 and 7 until you've seized all the required FSMO roles.
After you seize or transfer the roles, type q, and then press ENTER until you quit the Ntdsutil tool.

Popular posts from this blog

Fixing Tanzu Kubernetes Pod to External Services Connectivity Issues with NSX-T

Fixing Tanzu Kubernetes Pod to External Services Connectivity Issues with NSX-T Last month I got a call from a customer who was pulling their hair out over a networking issue. They had just deployed VMware Tanzu Kubernetes Grid on their vSphere with Tanzu environment, everything looked good in the dashboards, all pods were running, but their applications inside the pods could not reach external databases running on traditional VMs in the same datacenter. The frustrating part was that some pods could reach external services perfectly fine, while others would just timeout. There was no clear pattern. Let me tell you how we figured this out and fixed it. The Initial Problem Here is what the customer setup looked like: vSphere 8.0 with Tanzu enabled NSX-T 4.1.2 for networking Three Tanzu Kubernetes clusters running different microservices applications External PostgreSQL database running on traditional VMs (non-Kubernetes) External API services running on another se...

Troubleshooting vSAN Storage Policy Migration Failures in VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0

Recently I had a customer who migrated their VMware infrastructure from vSphere 7.0 to VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0. After the migration, they wanted to update their vSAN storage policies to take advantage of the new vSAN ESA (Express Storage Architecture) features. However, when they tried to change the storage policy for their production VMs, the operation kept failing with a cryptic error message. The error they were getting was: "Cannot complete operation due to insufficient resources to satisfy current storage policy." This was strange because they had plenty of disk space available. The vSAN cluster was only at 45% capacity, and all the hosts were healthy. Let me walk through how we troubleshooted and fixed this issue. Understanding the Problem First, let's understand what was happening in their environment: They had a 6-node vSAN cluster running VCF 9.0 vSAN was configured with the new ESA architecture They were trying to migrate VMs fro...

Unlocking VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0: A Strategic Blueprint for Enterprise Transformation

The evolution of VMware under Broadcom represents not disruption, but clarification—a focused vision toward unified private cloud excellence. As organizations navigate this transformation, the opportunity has never been greater to build truly modern, efficient, and powerful infrastructure with VMware Cloud Foundation. After architecting VMware solutions across diverse enterprise environments, I've observed a pattern: organizations that embrace VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) strategically—rather than viewing the transition as a burden—emerge with significantly more capable, cost-effective, and future-ready infrastructure. This post shares a practical framework for successfully modernizing your VMware environment, maximizing your investment, and positioning your organization for the AI-driven, cloud-native future. Understanding the VMware Cloud Foundation Vision Let's start with clarity about what Broadcom and VMware are building: VMware Cloud Foundati...